From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c019ad9cc913bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-15 21:26:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!teaser.fr!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Grein, Christoph" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada2005 temp solo child Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:19:58 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1032150362 22335 137.194.161.2 (16 Sep 2002 04:26:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to using -f Content-MD5: VIR66/e04DdkVTg+DEGFDA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: "Grein, Christoph" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29003 Date: 2002-09-16T06:19:58+02:00 From: ica2ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de >=20 > In article you = wrote: > >> While developing an application, I have e.g. a parent.child > >> but not yet a parent package, which may or may come later. > >> Now my compiler forces me to have the parent. > >> I would prefer the ada standard would force the compiler > >> to allow parentless children. > >> Did I ignore some important aspect? >=20 > > I do not know, but the request seems silly to me. Why is it so = disturbing to=20 create a=20 > > dummy parent, which is still empty. It has to be created anyway = eventually,=20 so=20 > > why not just now? If there will never be a parent, why have the = hierarchy at=20 > > all? >=20 > Haetten Sie meine Anfrage genau durchgelesen, > dann haetten Sie mich nicht gleich beleidigen muessen. Entschuldigen Sie bitte meine saloppe Ausdrucksweise - das war nicht = als=20 Beleidigung gedacht. Silly als =DCbersetzung von unsinnig, nicht = bl=F6dsinnig...=20 Nonesensical w=E4re vielleicht besser gewesen. Trotzdem, mein Einwand bleibt bestehen. In meinen Augen macht dieser = Vorschlag=20 wirklich keinen Sinn. Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Christoph Grein