From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2, BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,565ee1c43df7874f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-12 09:38:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: array of operations Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:37:42 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <3D7E0EB1.2070708@attbi.com> <7vfzwh9dkl.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <3D80A553.5030208@attbi.com> <3d80bd8d.30112108@news.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1031848682 6549 137.194.161.2 (12 Sep 2002 16:38:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Original-Cc: john@assen.demon.co.uk Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28873 Date: 2002-09-12T11:37:42-05:00 Note the word "or". As far as I can see, _you_ are mistaken. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John McCabe" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: Re: array of operations > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:32:10 GMT, Mark Biggar > wrote: > > >Ehud Lamm wrote: > >>>Not true. Since it is always OK to take 'Unchecked_Access of a parameter > >>>of a tagged type in Ada 95, you generally do not need to explicitly use > >>>"aliased". Claw uses this extensively to provide an interface which is > >>>mostly without access types, yet internally everything is linked > >>>together. (Claw uses finalization to prevent dangling pointers in this > >>>case). > > > >> Sure. You can rephrase what I wrote, "You usually need to decalre aliased > >> objects, or use 'Unchecked_Access." :-) > > > >um, tagged objects are by definition aliased, see ARM 3.10(9). No need > >for an explisit declaration. > > Do you mean this bit: > > "and a formal parameter or generic formal object of a tagged type are > defined to be aliased"? > > Note the word "generic". As far as I can see, you are mistaken. > > _______________________________________________ > comp.lang.ada mailing list > comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada >