From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-26 03:54:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!oleane.net!oleane!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Grein, Christoph" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: status of Ada STL? Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:50:19 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1025088842 10996 137.194.161.2 (26 Jun 2002 10:54:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to using -f Content-MD5: sxHltm/4aao9Wh4pyZdfoQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: "Grein, Christoph" List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26710 Date: 2002-06-26T12:50:19+02:00 > I also agree about the record notation of > type X is record ... > end record ; > being the subject of continual error, both in writing and in reading. > [snip] > > When reading code, it is much more difficult to match up "record" with > the right "is record ..." than it would be to match "end X" with the one > and only "type X". I see the point in having "end record X;", but I do not buy that it's difficult to match it with "type X" since records cannot be nested.