From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ea344239fca489e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-08 16:22:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does anyone have GNAT documentation in pdf-format? Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 18:21:32 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1023578522 4305 137.194.161.2 (8 Jun 2002 23:22:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25569 Date: 2002-06-08T18:21:32-05:00 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Dudley" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Does anyone have GNAT documentation in pdf-format? > I think not, I have the full version of Acrobat and that > should suffice. For the same reason, I shouldn't need to > install GhostScript. No, there appears to be something > wrong with the quality of the original ps-files but, on the > off chance that someone has corrected them, I thought I'd > enguire the newsgroup. You're quite correct, as I pointed out in my earlier message, some pages are not correctly rendered as pdf. Personally, I prefer the html documentation for its navigability. I've never tried to print the User's Guide, as it's not the sort of thing I settle down in my Lazy Boy to read ;)