From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2, BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a43471f113780a14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-08 09:41:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)? Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:41:45 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0206080400.2fcaa9c5@posting.google.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1023554462 92585 137.194.161.2 (8 Jun 2002 16:41:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 16:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25547 Date: 2002-06-08T11:41:45-05:00 ----- Original Message ----- From: "chris.danx" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: June 08, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: Re: Is there a Graphical IDE to GNAT 3.14p (Win2K platform)? > No I'm not. I said your customers "are getting" GPS, I didn't say they'd > got GPS or when they'd get it (after all that's up to ACT). Perphaps my > phrasing of that was a bit ambiguous and I apologise for any confusion that > may have caused. When I went to school, "are getting" was present tense (not ambiguous at all), but perhaps things have changed in the last 50+ years.