From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2, BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b283baa6a69c5e41 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-18 01:10:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Byte order writing to socket stream Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 03:09:00 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <4519e058.0205171311.56c3d567@posting.google.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1021709403 87048 137.194.161.2 (18 May 2002 08:10:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 08:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24340 Date: 2002-05-18T03:09:00-05:00 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Wright" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: May 18, 2002 1:47 AM Subject: Re: Byte order writing to socket stream > > I don't know whether ACT make any guarantees about the stability of > the wire format used by their Annex E support between releases; to be > safe you might want to use the same release both ends. > GNAT implements the XDR spec, so it should be the same between releases. > You'd be most unlikely to get interoperability with other Ada > compilers (even if you could find one with Annex A support). > They all are required to have Annex A support. Did you mean Annex E?