From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1dd28d5040ded1f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-09 07:24:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E1rio_Amado_Alves?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Announce: Grace project site operational Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:23:52 +0100 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1020954242 17153 137.194.161.2 (9 May 2002 14:24:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4519e058.0205090554.1e58d951@posting.google.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23771 Date: 2002-05-09T15:23:52+01:00 "Is there no way a generic type parameter can have a default value ?" (LK) "Not a *type* parameter, no. Perhaps this is something that should be looked at for the next Ada revision?" (TED) Hmmm... This is the essence of a previous thread initiated by myself on 'types as objects', which, if I remember correctly, lead to reflexion with an example from an ASIS application. The subject dropped silently then, so I should guess no, it will not make it into the next Ada revision. --MAA