From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91ec3b1c30b751e5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-03 09:37:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!deine.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E1rio_Amado_Alves?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: cross-platform source code editor Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 18:36:54 +0100 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1017855424 23457 137.194.161.2 (3 Apr 2002 17:37:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3cab2a7e.30287551@news.demon.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22060 Date: 2002-04-03T18:36:54+01:00 > Emacs is certainly better now than it used to be, with Customization options on > the menus. Yes, but not enough for me. I still find the structure and operation confusing. But the again, it might be merely subjective. >> BTW in my opinion the best free editor for readability out there is >> jGRASP. I'm planning to reinstall it. Hope the few bugs it had some >> time ago are smashed by now. > That's presumably a java tool - isn't it dog slow? Yes it is written in Java. (It used to be in C, I think.) But no, it is not slow. And does prety complex things too. You should have a look see. /* As was already noted here on CLA, Java's reputation for being slow is mostly false. */ --MAA