From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21f9679c40f65a8c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-02 09:08:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!deine.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
Date: Tue,  2 Apr 2002 12:07:52 -0500 (EST)
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1017767282.9099.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1017767282 80528 137.194.161.2 (2 Apr 2002 17:08:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:08:02 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <dewar@gnat.com>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Original-Cc: dewar@gnat.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22002
Date: 2002-04-02T12:07:52-05:00

<<I do not dispute the correctness of the diagnostic, but what I am
curious about is why the diagnostic complains about "**", but
doesn't complain about "*".
>>

Because a matching "*" is declared but no matching "**"