From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a6aeee789a6cf1ca,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-17 22:01:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!isdnet!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: Christoph Grein <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: labeling (was: partitioning (was: Future))
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:59:03 +0100 (MET)
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1016431262.29347.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1016431263 77414 137.194.161.2 (18 Mar 2002 06:01:03
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:01:03 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
Content-MD5: dvJNU5t1J/yFD6jJkJtOSw==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc 
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
X-Reply-To: Christoph Grein <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21396
Date: 2002-03-18T06:59:03+01:00

> From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
> In my opinion, the two best proposals so far are
> 
>    Label:
>       case/if expression is/then
>          .....
>       end case/if Label;
> 
> AND
> 
>    case/if expression is/then
>        .....
>    end case/if (expression);
> 
> The first is simpler, but the second has more flexibility.

Really, where is the _inflexibility_ of the first form? Because you have to 
invent a name for the label?