From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fb6ec6cd054de65 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-14 03:03:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Christoph Grein Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: constrained subtypes Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:01:43 +0100 (MET) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1016103804 15932 137.194.161.2 (14 Mar 2002 11:03:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Content-MD5: z99iK91sj9Lx1E5WkZHDjw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Christoph Grein List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21208 Date: 2002-03-14T12:01:43+01:00 > Christoph Grein wrote in message > Nice exegesis, I also thought it was this way. But when I looked into the RM, I found only: > > <> > > Why look in chapter 4 here. If you are interested in case > statements, look in chapter 5 at the section on case > statements. Sometimes it is indeed hard to find things in > the RM, but not in this case! I was interested in evaluating expressions, so this seemed the obvious place. > 5.4 Case Statements > snip > > Well this is hardly obscure enough to warrant the term > exegesis :-) Of course not :-) Robert's accurate as always :-) Thank you for pointing out the correct chapter and verse.