From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2353cc2ebdf8fc4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-05 13:36:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: sk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Gibson's vision of computer languajes Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 15:35:03 -0600 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <1P7h8.42052$R16.5940005@news11-gui.server.ntli.net> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1015364164 46666 137.194.161.2 (5 Mar 2002 21:36:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-4.3mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20829 Date: 2002-03-05T15:35:03-06:00 Hi, >In the past few weeks there have been a few threads where the >OP never contributed to the thread past the original post >(roughly once every two or three weeks). Huge threads resulted >from these, mainly because the post was designed to provoke such >an argument, with little accomplished because most ppls minds >are made up on the issue in question. Seems it's all too >easy to do. At least it makes no attempt to claim a relationship to Ada and is clearly marked OT for a change :-) I think cla has done remarkably well so far this year. It is already march and the perenial * Ada vs C ... * Ada should do it my way ... * ACT/Aonix etc should do it my way ... wars havn't broken out yet (holding breath and crosssing fingers :-) Luckily, the "Future with Ada" thread has not escalated and actually moved into identifying various "Rosen" posters. o o | \_/ -- ------------------------------------- -- Merge vertically for real address ------------------------------------- s n p @ t . o k i e k c c m -------------------------------------