From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e12d8e0da8e9a65 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-06 03:24:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Christoph Grein Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Thanks] Why is 'Adjust' not called here ??? Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:23:36 +0100 (MET) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1012994643 21306 137.194.161.2 (6 Feb 2002 11:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Content-MD5: ileS946jqPQi0k92NoZYvQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Christoph Grein List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19667 Date: 2002-02-06T12:23:36+01:00 > By the way, by reading your answers I discovered that the reason for me > not finding the correct reference was that I was using the "On-line > version of the Ada 95 Rationale at AdaPower.com" which is clearly > missing the "Implementation Requirements" you refer to. So I guess that > it is not up to date and misses the last corrections. Hough ! > > Now, I know it is better to consult > "www.ada-auth.org/arm-html/RM-TOC.html" instead ;-) Please note that the "Ada 95 Rationale" is just that, the "rationale" about the Reference Manual, it is _not_ the "Reference Manual" itself. The Rationale _is_ up to date. I do not know whether the URL above is the correct one for "Reference Manual with Technical Corrigendum 1". Watch out. The latter is definitely somewhere at that site. HTH