From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce0900b60ca3f616 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-02 07:59:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Francisco Javier Loma Daza Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List container strawman Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:57:57 +0100 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <9rti6v$hcu$1@news.huji.ac.il> <9ruc8c$i68$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1004716746 33190 137.194.161.2 (2 Nov 2001 15:59:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:59:06 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <9ruc8c$i68$1@nh.pace.co.uk> X-Mailer: Spruce 0.7.4 for X11 w/smtpio 0.8.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Francisco.Loma@isotrol.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15659 Date: 2001-11-02T16:57:57+01:00 On 2 Nov 2001, Marin David Condic wrote: > Date: 2 Nov 2001 14:57:16 GMT > To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > From: "Marin David Condic" ] > Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org > Subject: Re: List container strawman > > Limited private sounds like a good idea to me - with operations to assign > one list to another via duplication. > > One other thing: Allow me publically to display my ignorance. If Element > is > private, how does this play with tagged records? I know there is a > "tagged > private" formal type - but I've never played with it so I don't know what > the implications are for that. If the formal is tagged private then you can derive a tagged type from it. generic type T is tagged private; package DD type Object is new T with null record; end DD;