From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce0900b60ca3f616
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-01 20:36:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!proxad.net!teaser.fr!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: Eric Merritt <cyberlync@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: List container strawman
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 20:35:05 -0800 (PST)
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1004675765.27706.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1004675766 14367 137.194.161.2 (2 Nov 2001 04:36:06
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 04:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Return-Path: <cyberlync@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <kPoE7.9567$xS6.13287@www.newsranger.com>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ada.eu.org/pipermail/comp.lang.ada/>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15614
Date: 2001-11-01T20:35:05-08:00

Just out of curiosity, for the iteration functions
would it be more efficient/readable to provide a
Has_Next and Has_Previous routines that return a
boolean? I realize that you have already provided
mechenisims in teh Size function and the raiseing the
No_More exception.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com