From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b61052ba3fdc8c26 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-01 10:43:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Wilhelm Spickermann Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Integers and Mathematical Correctness Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 19:40:42 +0100 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1004640183 90570 137.194.161.2 (1 Nov 2001 18:43:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:43:03 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86 Demo) Content-Disposition: inline X-Sender: 0211750756-0001@t-dialin.net Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15565 Date: 2001-11-01T19:40:42+01:00 --On Thursday, November 01, 2001 16:11:06 +0000 Charles Lindsey wrote: > Then, of course, hardware got to be built the "wrong" way. In > every subsequent programming language (ALGOL 68, Pascal, Ada) > the language designers knew perfectly well that they were > designing it wrong, but dared not make the change. I railed > against this in 1983, and that is more or less what I was told > :-( . At least Niklaus Wirth was daring enough -- Oberon had a "div"-Operator obeying x=(x div y)*y+(x mod y) and 0<=(x mod y)