From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b61052ba3fdc8c26 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-31 14:47:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Beard, Frank" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Integers and Mathematical Correctness Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:42:20 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1004568466 54176 137.194.161.2 (31 Oct 2001 22:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:47:46 +0000 (UTC) To: "'comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org'" Return-Path: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15516 Date: 2001-10-31T17:42:20-05:00 -----Original Message----- From: chris.danx [mailto:chris.danx@ntlworld.com] > why does > > xxx : c_integer := c_integer(-3)/c_integer(2); work then? ^ Because --------------------------^ this operator is inherited from integer for the new type. This division operator is for the new derived type c_integer. Remember "new" causes it to be treated as a unique type (i.e. they can't be intermixed without conversion). >Is it not the same? No, it's for the derived type. Now if you did the following, it would be the same (same being, it would use Standard integer). xxx : c_integer := c_integer(-3/2); or maybe xxx : c_integer := c_integer(integer(-3)/integer(2)); The first may be universal integer, whereas, the second is integer. Frank