From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-10 10:15:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Steven Deller" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it? Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:05:26 -0400 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1002734155 51013 137.194.161.2 (10 Oct 2001 17:15:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:15:55 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14181 Date: 2001-10-10T13:05:26-04:00 > -----Original Message----- > From: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org > [mailto:comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org]On Behalf Of Pascal Obry > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:38 AM > To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it? > john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) writes: > > > On 9 Oct 2001 18:48:24 -0700, Robert*@ > > wrote: > > > > >I wish the Ada95 designers would have introduced the class > construct as in > > > > Me too but why not just: > > This issue is worked on. See AI95-00252 on > http://www.ada-auth.org/AI-SUMMARY.HTML. Pascal AI95-00252 only discusses Object.Method as a syntactic sugar alternative to Package.Method(Object,...) Is there an AI dealing with defining class xxx and class xxx extends yyy procedure .. as syntactic sugar alternatives to package is type xxx is ... as John McCabe described? It seems to me that would make the "sugar" sweeter :-), and seems consistent with the object.method approach described in the AI. Regards, Steve "Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen." Steven Deller Smooth Sailing LLC 410 757 6924 deller@smsail.com