From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-10 06:43:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Francisco Javier Loma Daza Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it? Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:41:41 +0200 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com> <3BBD12F1.9BED0B70@acm.org> <3BC0B1D4.21C79A8@acm.org> <3bc1d137.20930256@news.demon.co.uk> <3bc3ffb5.826258@news.demon.co.uk> <3bc40fef.1827097@news.demon.co.uk> <3bc442df.9225555@news.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1002721386 44635 137.194.161.2 (10 Oct 2001 13:43:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:43:06 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <3bc442df.9225555@news.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: Spruce 0.7.4 for X11 w/smtpio 0.8.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Francisco.Loma@isotrol.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14150 Date: 2001-10-10T15:41:41+02:00 On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:50:15 GMT > To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > From: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) > Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org > Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it? > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:27:49 +0200, Francisco Javier Loma Daza > wrote: > > > The problem is not in naming 'Object' the types, but the extra level > >(innecesary) of qualification for the parent object name > > GParent.GChild.Object new GChild.Object will work. > > You appear to be absolutely correct in your other message. I have > chatted to my colleague about this. It would appear that our discovery > of this problem was that we were automatically generating our code > from Rational Rose which, unusually in this case, appears to have > managed to do its name resolution correctly! It's unfortunate that it > didn't realise the code it was producing was useless without > modification. > > > Anyway - I appreciate you pointing this out, you learn something new > every day, huh :-) Me too :-) > > >Escecifying > > What's "escecifying"? Well :) my english is really sloopy ... What I meant was that if you type type Object is new GParent.GChild.Object is ... you are referencig to package GParent, and that package is a generic one.