From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a46843ba8cee64d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-19 08:02:00 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "David C. Hoos" <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: dinamic object reclamation
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:02:36 -0500
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1000911674.26941.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
References: <9oa69d$6ej$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1000911719 58436 137.194.161.2 (19 Sep 2001 15:01:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Return-Path: <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto: comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto: comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ada.eu.org/pipermail/comp.lang.ada/>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13179
Date: 2001-09-19T10:02:36-05:00

Yes, you have to use Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation to free the memory.

Types derived from Ada.Finalization.Controlled can have their memory
automatically freed when execution leaves the scope in which it was
declared.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anisimkov" <anisimkov@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: dinamic object reclamation


> I wrote the test program about it.
> -----------------------------
> with text_io; use text_io;
> procedure alloc is
> 
>   dummy : character;
> 
>   procedure act (i : integer)
>   is
>       type block is array (1 .. 1024) of integer;
>       type block_ptr is access all block;
>       ptr : block_ptr;
>   begin
>       ptr := new block;
>       ptr (ptr'LAst) := i;
>       put (integer'image(I));
>   end;
> 
> begin
>   for i in 1..20000 loop
>     act (i);
>     get_immediate(dummy);
>   end loop;
> end;
> --------------------
> The question is:
> Is memory allocated by
>       ptr := new block;
> have to be freed automatically after leaving of procedure act ?
> Am I have to use Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation for free memory ?
> I'm acking becouse there is a memory leak without Unchecked_Deallocation
> when program compiled in the GNAT 3.13.
> Is it bug or regular behavior ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
>