From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fb8e2af320d5b3e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed3-b.proxad.net!nnrp14-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org X-Greylist: delayed 3728 seconds by postgrey-1.24 at green; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:37:55 CEST From: Duncan Sands To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Subject: Re: AW: Bus error Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:35:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <0367891DA5DA7E408D42A860FA002F44B0CC48@sma2901.cr.eurocopter.corp> In-Reply-To: <0367891DA5DA7E408D42A860FA002F44B0CC48@sma2901.cr.eurocopter.corp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 at math.u-psud.fr Cc: "Grein, Christoph \(Fa. ESG\)" X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jun 2007 12:40:01 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1183113601 news-3.free.fr 29000 88.191.14.223:53612 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16339 Date: 2007-06-29T12:40:01+02:00 > > ... one objection against Ada 2005 design is that now it is impossible > to > have types which objects were strictly temporal, i.e. to prevent > creation > of variables. Consider this: > > > > [ type T (<>) is limited private; ] > > > > X : T := Factory; -- Was illegal in Ada 95 > > > > Foo (Factory); -- That's OK in Ada 95 you could do X : T renames Factory; Ciao, Duncan.