From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2b3e0a81ca523a4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-14 07:31:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Duncan Sands Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada compiler Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:27:25 +0200 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <214d6b7.0404140559.70966796@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1081952859 5954 212.85.156.195 (14 Apr 2004 14:27:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:27:39 +0000 (UTC) To: ludovic.brenta@insalien.org (Ludovic Brenta), comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 In-Reply-To: <214d6b7.0404140559.70966796@posting.google.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7094 Date: 2004-04-14T16:27:25+02:00 On Wednesday 14 April 2004 15:59, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Sergey said: > > Ok, I don't know exactly but the only thing that I can said for > > certain - it isn't that good. I've tried to compile aws-1.4.0 using > > 3.2.3. Compilation finished well, but regression tests have badly > > failed... > > Have you filed problem reports in GCC's bugzilla? This kind of > information, if detailed, is very valuable, especially if the problems > are regressions since 3.15p. > > I just received a bunch of very detailed bug reports for 3.15p. Since > 3.15p doesn't have a public bug database, I'll file them in the Debian > bug tracking system for all to see. Time permitting, I'll do this over > this and next weeks. Hi Ludovic, gcc 3.2.3 is horribly out of date, so wouldn't it be pointless to file bug reports against it? Better to use gcc from CVS. Ciao, Duncan.