From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:46:47 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <magn37$np9$1@loke.gir.dk>
References: 
 <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad><199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com><87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org><4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com><87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org><d865c2cd-dd78-4dd9-8ca5-7526bc781faf@googlegroups.com><87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org><bb6afd60-da67-4b0a-93ca-2921b985cc3e@googlegroups.com><m8ds96$po2$1@news.albasani.net>
 <m8em0g$a03$2@dont-email.me><724c149f-0396-42a4-8594-bdbf21cce0d9@googlegroups.com><mafse7$nul$1@dont-email.me>
 <lyzj90s7hi.fsf@pushface.org><mage2b$b2s$1@dont-email.me>
 <lyvbjorx4a.fsf@pushface.org><magi1s$tcq$2@dont-email.me>
 <lylhkkcdec.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rrsoftware.com
X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1422647207 24361 24.196.82.226 (30 Jan 2015 19:46:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:192127
Date: 2015-01-30T13:46:47-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message 
news:lylhkkcdec.fsf@pushface.org...
...
> I can't at the moment include Ada.Containers.* in my STM32F4 RTS,
> because I don't support memory allocation,

The bounded containers shouldn't require any allocation; there is 
Implementation Advice to avoid that.

If there is an issue, it's probably with finalization. The containers 
themselves aren't supposed to use finalization, but its likely that the 
iterators and references do.

> and AdaCore don't include any
> Containers in their Ravenscar RTSs for the same board, and I only have
> 192K of RAM to play with! but if I did, I'd use the FSF version.

A bounded container is only as big as you need it to be. (Well, unless the 
compiler is doing something unfriendly.) Not having bounded containers is 
pretty much like not having arrays, IMHO.

                                  Randy.