From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is the best license to use for open source software? Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:06:33 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <616ae348-41f6-446f-9c4b-0da8e398e75b@googlegroups.com> <1391828381444007928.494546nonlegitur-futureapps.invalid@reader80.eternal-september.org> <1bmcls0l0g4ka$.1u5nfke8o2aod.dlg@40tude.net> <8f389b7e-31e8-48ea-98c4-cd4471db9293@googlegroups.com> <1w1u3p8o0pf3u.5fidvp7gla8x$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="5466"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18I5P7/nsGbAZkVcJIJ5czAD0bHvnnzwJo=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:3MvdLGHCpSV/aZzZ9jeyyY2LFnM= Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:192098 Date: 2015-01-29T15:06:33+01:00 List-Id: On 29.01.15 13:47, Vadim Godunko wrote: > On 01/29/2015 03:23 PM, G.B. wrote: >> >> Also, using XML Processing Instructions (PIs), you could >> be specifically using XML and avoid another XML namespace >> plus more node names: >> >> >>
>> ... >>
>> >> > Use of PI doesn't protect from generation of invalid HTML, It doesn't protect, if used in the way outlined, yes. I'd rather not use it for bracketing stuff, syntax-wise. Only for simple substitutions, say. OTOH, if the instruction can be more "heavy": ... which makes the PI apply to the next element so identified. It's a bit like providing for writing Iterate (Page, Tr'Access);