From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,589d16556c145528 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!news.wiretrip.org!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder2.news.jippii.net!reader1.news.jippii.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Tapio Kelloniemi Subject: Re: Ada2005 again, was: non-library level finalization References: <423e8bb1$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:09:38 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.30.176.187 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: reader1.news.jippii.net 1111410578 217.30.176.187 (Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:09:38 EET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:09:38 EET Organization: Saunalahti Customer Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9669 Date: 2005-03-21T13:09:38+00:00 List-Id: "Martin Dowie" wrote: >tmoran@acm.org wrote: >> I have a generic package that would benefit from doing some cleanup >> when an instantiation disappears. It can't just declare a (private) >> Finalization_Controlled object because that would require all >> instantiations to be at library level. Suggestions? > >Other than waiting for Ada2005... What method does Ada2005 provide to handle this problem? And in general, is there some sort of summary which lists changes in Ada2005 (with references to corresponding AI's). I know where AI's are stored, but there are quite many of them and looking through all of them to just look up their summary line is quite a slow process. I have read the AdaCore's ada2005 page, but it is not accurate enough and lists only major changes. -- Tapio