From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108abf,d3bcc180a8b0eea4
X-Google-Attributes: gid108abf,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3bcc180a8b0eea4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: RSWhite@nospam.somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: F22 completes 11% of its Flight tests]
Date: 2000/01/19
Message-ID: <mEqh4.1156$IF5.29136@news.rdc1.il.home.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 574871865
References: <387C8859.621FA20B@netscape.net>
 <387CC1C0.4C57E34C@quadruscorp.com>
 <jW3f4.2191$iy5.112956@typ12.deja.bcandid.com> <387CEE4A.3965@Ganymede.com>
 <Ft6f4.2216$iy5.114812@typ12.deja.bcandid.com>
 <387F8E50.11D27E14@quadruscorp.com> <85oclj$nbp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <387FCA73.3A61@Ganymede.com>
 <85ok6v$iee$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com>
 <3880CCC7.261957BC@quadruscorp.com>
 <oHcg4.2964$iy5.180009@typ12.deja.bcandid.com> <yecaem64cny.fsf@king.cts.com>
 <Dgng4.3103$iy5.189829@typ12.deja.bcandid.com>
 <38835B50.B2EF88C6@quadruscorp.com>
 <G9Jg4.3280$iy5.211569@typ12.deja.bcandid.com>
 <38838D5A.9EB9F452@maths.unine.ch>
 <nhMg4.3374$iy5.215390@typ12.deja.bcandid.com>
 <hx9h4.304$IF5.13456@news.rdc1.il.home.com> <864hrd$546$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news.rdc1.il.home.com 948319890 24.10.221.229 (Wed,
 19 Jan 2000 14:11:30 PST)
Organization: ...
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:11:30 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,rec.aviation.military
Date: 2000-01-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <864hrd$546$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, dennison@telepath.com says...
>
>In article <hx9h4.304$IF5.13456@news.rdc1.il.home.com>,
>  RSWhite@nospam.somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White) wrote:
>> In article <nhMg4.3374$iy5.215390@typ12.deja.bcandid.com>,
>jtarver@tminet.com says...
>> >
>> >...  What the poster implied to me is that the
>> >extensions are part of a tool set now.
>>
>>   And back in 1985 when DEC Ada came out the "extensions" (aka
>> Starlet package) were part of a tool set then.  There never were
>> any "DEC Ada extensions".  Why don't you just admit that you
>> are/were wrong?
>
>That's silly. You can't call Starlet "extensions to Ada" any more than
>you can call the Motif library "extensions to C". Its just a (big
>honking) package someone wrote, in Ada.

  Exactly!

-- 
Robert S. White         -- An embedded systems software engineer
e-mail reply to reverse of ( add .'s ): com home shift2 rswhite
            or do a "Reply To All" for direct eMailed cc'd followups.