From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 10:26:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:28:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:26:36 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ED6A852.75AC0133@adaworks.com> <3ED74ED3.4020505@noplace.com> <3ed75cc3$1@news.wineasy.se> <3ED7779E.930ABCEA@adaworks.com> In-Reply-To: <3ED7779E.930ABCEA@adaworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.106 X-Trace: sv3-dsoMrwEM0YCTjyzYGvTKZunh+FIU31xwAl4nKVj70gLrELQriKBeP6PKkoA7KKkjlSTcuSSuV467vDG!W547RqBXBuT7HVx6FK7QXqI5ADK9f1tE4pCcqfaTUHtxoL3wmNxQPfqtMS3ESRH+xzPHyyLBO16p!uTmsqw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38125 Date: 2003-05-30T12:26:36-05:00 List-Id: > professors find themselves with little motivation to do work related to > Ada. If such funding were available, I would be happy to encourage more > of my own students to pursue more Ada projects, including the development > of more libraries. Is the Ada Resource Association still a viable group? If they are truly interested in the future of Ada, perhaps they would look at grant proposals for new Ada annexes and award grants to those that seem to be of particular value. "New" annexes might include bindings and/or all-Ada packages that implement existing standards, or alternate ways to provide functionality available in other languages, or something entirely new. Presumably the award committee would include in their evaluation criteria ensuring that the project includes some mechanism to ensure wide-spread acceptance of the result, i.e., plans for some sort of review by someone other than just the designers/coders.