From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "robin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <1hfu968.1i5puf26uqbldN%nospam@see.signature> <4474b632_1@news.bluewin.ch> Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 02:58:26 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.134.49.90 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1148612306 144.134.49.90 (Fri, 26 May 2006 12:58:26 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:58:26 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4479 comp.lang.fortran:10272 comp.lang.pl1:1725 Date: 2006-05-26T02:58:26+00:00 List-Id: "Gautier" wrote in message news:4474b632_1@news.bluewin.ch... > Nasser Abbasi: > > > Well, at least one thing is common between Ada and Fortran: Both are case INSENSITIVE. > > Two other points in common are readability (or, non-cryptic syntax) and (Fortran: 77+ ?) > full-bracketing (conditional or loop statements terminated by END). Both things are > extremely helpful for revising code, which is crucial for scientific programming, and > separate the pre- (Pascal, C) and post-1977 compiled languages. Except that Algol had those by 1960 and PL/I in 1966.