From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Michael B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about name resolution Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:25:06 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: f8nSRFf7PiDgnjufWcw+xQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24672 Date: 2015-01-21T19:25:06+01:00 List-Id: On 01/20/15 21:39, Robert A Duff wrote: > This rule is followed in the Annotated version by 25 paragraphs of > explanatory text! See AARM-8.3(26.a-26.k). And several AI's were > needed to fix bugs in this rule. > > I challenge you to provide wording that would forbid your case, > and cases like it. ;-) A modification or addition to 8.3(26), > I mean. It's not easy! I give up ;-) Since I never came across this problem before, the current rules seem to be quite okay... And thank you for the explanation. Regards, Michael