From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Michael B." <michaelb@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question about name resolution
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:32:51 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <m9magv$a8e$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <m9m7s8$3g8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m9m8jj$1l7$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5uVkUgjfiX/db6AbgWoBrQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191944
Date: 2015-01-20T20:32:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 01/20/15 20:00, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> There's no way to call the 1st P by the name P. You could rename it and call it
> by the renamed name.

It works, thank you!
I found something similar in a library that I want to use.
I was surprised that this compiles without warnings if neither of the 
procedures is called. Why is such overloading allowed in Ada? It seems 
to make no sense to write a procedure that cannot be called directly.

Regards,

Michael