From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:36:57 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com> <87bnmd8mg2.fsf@ixod.org> <19cf9bc2-f8b9-4735-b427-7b070dda59da@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="2928"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/K7Dsob2ssJ5h5IxL7HMBBHDt6aLXj9QA=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:rsNwRT4ve5tPhYQmigdwbBvY4Qw= Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191716 Date: 2015-01-06T16:36:57+01:00 List-Id: On 06.01.15 15:45, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 06/01/2015 14:26, Stefan.Lucks@uni-weimar.de a écrit : >>> I would be happy to pay something in the field of 300$ for that system >>> as it is now, without tech support, if it allowed me to write small >>> closed suorce software. >> >> Agreed. The existence of such a compiler (by AdaCore or someone else) >> would be good for the Ada community. > > Unfortunately, I fear that nobody from Atego is reading this > newsgroup... (Yes, they (Alsys at that time) used to have a "personal" > version of the compiler). > Aonix used to sell a Windows compiler for $$$, up to v7.6 or v8.2, I believe. Atego has been acquired (7/2014) into the PTC staffing optimization enterprise(*), together with IBM Ada (then Atego Ada (then Rational Ada)). So, PTC has two Ada compilers, one rather complete (Ada 2005), the other using the AdaMagic frontend, which used to be sold by SofCheck (now AdaCore). Maybe making available a no-support compiler would be an addition that is tiny enough to not affect an enterprise's accounting efforts. (Compare it to keeping track of gift acquisition and other business expenses of the sales department.) But, OTOH, bigger enterprises need some incentive to make smaller products. What would that be? So, in the end, a reasonably simple Ada compiler for the non-enterprise Ada market would best be produced and maintained by ____. Fill in the blanks ;-) __ (*) http://atego.com/pressreleases/pressitem/ptc-to-acquire-atego http://de.ptc.com/about/news-room/press-releases/2014/07/ptc-completes-acquisition-of-atego