From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:43:54 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9d3e8459fcff41835e7b68eb9f2a14bb"; logging-data="10243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6gsfsog2WBuC7troCmOlAUCqywriyfEY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:9U2jSTrhLpwAayHDlM/fobYiMQM= Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191683 Date: 2015-01-05T11:43:54-07:00 List-Id: On 01/05/2015 04:24 AM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > David Botton wrote: > >> It is what it is. A demo of tech... > > No, it's not. It's not a demo, it's a fully featured product. If you don't > like the license, don't use it. Use FSF Gnat instead. In my experience, "shareware" has been used for full-featured software released at no cost with a request that those who find the S/W useful send some money to the developer(s). There is also the term "crippleware" for S/W released at no cost but lacking some feature(s) that can be obtained by paying for the full-featured version. GNAT GPL does not match this definition of "shareware". Some might claim that GNAT GPL does match this definition of "crippleware". As an example of crippleware, see http://www.wolframalpha.com/. Some offered features result in an exhortation to "Subscribe to Pro", and this is a characteristic of most crippleware that is not present in GNAT GPL. It would be easier to think of GNAT GPL as crippleware if every invocation of the compiler resulted in an encouragement to buy GNAT Pro that required action by the user before the compilation proceeded. The GNAT Pro/GNAT GPL dichotomy seems unique: two products with essentially identical features, differing only in the run-time license. Perhaps we should dub GNAT GPL "RTL-ware". -- Jeff Carter "Blessed is just about anyone with a vested interest in the status quo." Monty Python's Life of Brian 73