From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "G.B." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:40:30 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="24204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PomqWu2fOBiQCXS5jVNywt0oz2usbpZk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:eD8+OvOLpNbdTK1QMMWXasWB/FY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24364 Date: 2015-01-05T14:40:30+01:00 List-Id: On 05.01.15 12:38, David Botton wrote: > Demos are usually fully featured and the issue is the impression others will have of the availability of Ada. If the impressionion is Ada is available only for open source or high end niche that leaves most of the world in the middle. That is not Ada advocacy that is harmful. 2nd WRT impression management. Dragging in more notions, though, seem counterproductive to me if clarifying takes adducing their definition as well. Recursively.