From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Size of linked program increasing with new version of GNAT. Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1419604367.2226.5.camel@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="89e358ea4a00f60a9661e1a4fb814a75"; logging-data="5442"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+T/WqflfhynnawIvEfD47paoItZ2mWGxo=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:P+Akey8oouPFSeM6bPi33Eqno50= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24237 Date: 2014-12-26T15:55:52+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-12-26, Pascal Obry wrote: > > Since when "bigger size" means worse? > When you need the resulting executable to fit in fixed size flash memory. :-) (I'm answering the general question here and not discussing the OP's current environment.) > Have you looked at the actual code size (.text section)? > This is exactly what I was going to ask. It would be interesting for the OP to run the binutils size command on both executables and post the results. > > What is the price of the disk today compared to 10 years ago? > Not all executables run on a desktop PC. If current versions of GNAT have increased the actual minimum executable size this may be of interest for embedded environments. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world