From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd173879a595bde
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:35:44 -0600
From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <slrndmloee.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org>
 <meKdnXXIJd6tVPfeRVn-vw@comcast.com>
 <slrndmlus8.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org>
 <TlCaf.1406$uD5.768@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <S9OdnXaVctqkvvHeRVn-jQ@comcast.com>
 <YNWaf.50$Xo.35@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <Qs6dndQOsuQXkPPeRVn-qw@comcast.com>
 <SjDbf.744$Id6.15@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:36:18 -0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Message-ID: <m7SdnfCLg6stNO3eRVn-ow@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.20.111.245
X-Trace: 
 sv3-XDyX5w/xDLVk3V8ooGuLbgg0qoh1PnMGhYNpowrOWJrtLxWgL7epZV7ZRBHFnIq8DBa/+E1OXQuEhB8!xqrKlmVS2li2HrcRK8FRpWWAwtcnTCL2iVnhEfw+WZHhADJih+x9SBvSOkf/3aNjO1oH75oYmMrG
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6282
Date: 2005-11-08T05:36:18-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message 
news:SjDbf.744$Id6.15@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> You're missing my point.
>
> So it seems. And you're missing mine.
>

Not at all.

I was trying to make a different point.

Steve
(The Duck)

> -- 
> Jeff Carter
> "C's solution to this [variable-sized arrays] has real problems,
> and people who are complaining about safety definitely have a point."
> Dennis Ritchie
> 25