From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:=20GNAT=C2=A0and=20Tasklets?=
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:40:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m70va3$t6a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f9828477-a98e-4795-803d-5926aa7a1fdb@googlegroups.com>
 <cfe7hnFaj8oU1@mid.individual.net>
 <avd3b8es5f6d$.byde19f9gn19$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <8277a521-7317-4839-b0b6-97f8155be1a4@googlegroups.com>
 <fegtcevrst5z$.fck8rij41mwt.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9e1d2b9f-1b97-4679-8eec-5ba75f3c357c@googlegroups.com>
 <zdj4kqj1rzxe.o579icl2x61u$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <478c81f9-5233-4ae1-a3eb-e67c4dbd0da1@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:40:03 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="2e9069b09a60f0b49728aa111053cfdd";
	logging-data="29898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185APWUiP25XZN8+tfhy/SEhXx0H9OJNm8="
User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kQ3dLS80kXUpGog9ZXArB3UIC3o=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24140
Date: 2014-12-19T10:40:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

<vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com> wrote:

> It would be interesting to do a little survey on existing code using tasking.
> I have the impression that only tasks at Library level do rendez-vous and
> protected object synchronisation, and local tasks, most of the time, are
> limited to a rendez-vous with their parent task at the beginning or at
> the end. So maybe we should put restrictions on local tasks, so that we
> can map them to jobs.

Won't the parallel loop feature be providing
for this kind of mini job:

for Row of Matrix loop in parallel
   Remove_fractional (row):
End loop;