From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Michael B." <michaelb@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access parameters and accessibility
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:48:32 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <m6v41d$iur$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <m6n3kr$t51$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4f547857-ea9e-4baf-a705-911fbf9c633d@googlegroups.com>
 <m6pdoq$tt3$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <72048e0e-164a-4dce-8818-69454011a618@googlegroups.com>
 <m6s42s$pib$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <ace2540f-97ce-4d03-b028-3ee8e9990a48@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: BwT254shNqiZ3mfME3kSUA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24121
Date: 2014-12-18T18:48:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12/17/14 16:41, sbelmont700@gmail.com wrote:
> It sounds very much like a compiler bug; regardless of the mechanism
> that the compiler writer chooses to use to implement the rules of the
> language, it must in fact implement them correctly and completely
> (i.e. all those conversions should pass, no matter if they use the
> model proposed in the paper, or something else entirely).

That makes sense. So it seems my misunderstanding came from too much 
trust in a compiler...