Re: Access parameters and accessibility

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Natasha Kerensikova" <lithiumcat@instinctive.eu> wrote in message 
news:slrnm92al9.nrc.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu...
...
> Am I doing something danegerous here?
> Should I try to find another pattern to achieve the same effects?
>
> From what I understood, here accessibility is statically known to be
> fine, isn't it? Or is there a trap hidden in there?

I think it is *supposed* to be statically fine. Whether the actual rules 
have that effect is unclear. Most likely, implementers will follow the 
intent rather than the actual rules (but since there have been a number of 
cases to the contrary, I wouldn't assume that unconditionally -- always 
check). (And no, I'm not going to try to figure this out for you, I try to 
minimize trips into this area.)

As always with accessibility, whenever we look at it in detail, someone 
finds a problem where the rules aren't quite what we want. That's why it's 
known as the "Heart of Darkness".

                                             Randy.