From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Generic instantiation before actual subprogram body Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:31:37 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="23dab0694e4174fdc880833ec67fa650"; logging-data="28702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/dtoWgpOs4SXi+c0K86D5k" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:syZOR/bLXXIUeWubQHf48sF3OR8= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23857 Date: 2014-12-04T10:31:37+01:00 List-Id: Le 04/12/2014 09:48, Natasha Kerensikova a écrit : > My question is now, in which set of circumstances is it allowed (or > forbidden) to instantiate a generic with a subprogram whose body has not > yet been seen by the compiler? RM2012(11.5(20)): "When [...] a generic instantiation is elaborated, check that the body of the corresponding unit has already been elaborated." FYI: to find it, go to the index, and follow the references for "Program_Error". -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr