From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:31:59 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24-196-82-226.static.mdsn.wi.charter.com X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1415842321 10739 24.196.82.226 (13 Nov 2014 01:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:32:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:190510 Date: 2014-11-12T19:31:59-06:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:bb27f98c-bf30-4287-acb3-7ee2b284f22f@googlegroups.com... > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:53:48 PM UTC-5, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >> One of the reasons we built Claw was to provide a Windows interface that >> would work on any Ada 95 compiler for Windows, not just GNAT. That >> requires >> displine and testing that most hobbyests wouldn't bother with. >> >> Randy. > > I was under the impression that any Win32 Ada program was by definition > compiler-specific, >since there is no standardized way to import stdcall subprograms? I suppose that's formally true ("stdcall" not appearing in the RM), but every Ada compiler for Windows that I know of uses "stdcall" for the convention name. (Janus/Ada was the only one that didn't initially, and that was easily solved. :-) So practically, that's not a portability problem. We were able to put the differences into a handful of packages (mostly having to do with linking pragmas). Randy.