From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6c75b0f89a0f085
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: What's wrong with this code?
Date: 1999/04/20
Message-ID: <m3zp43ywi8.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 468814491
References: <7fi85m$sb3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7fiegr$43q$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7fig4m$5f5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 11:26:40 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-04-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dennison@telepath.com writes:

> I tried adding the following declarations:
>     type Alarm_List is array (1..2) of Alarm_P;
> 
>     type Alarm is tagged limited
>     ...
>             Al : Alarm_List := (others => Alarm'Access);
> 
> And got this error (on the "Al" field) instead:
> alarm_model.ads:52:43: non-local pointer cannot point to local object

What message do you get if you use 'Unchecked_Access instead of 'Access?