From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2cdc6c2ee911fe77
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Preben Randhol <randhol@pvv.org>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++
Date: 2000/02/11
Message-ID: <m3zot8mblb.fsf@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 584454352
References: <38A37C97.9E181025@interact.net.au>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no
X-Trace: kopp.stud.ntnu.no 950254774 3459 129.241.83.82 (11 Feb 2000 07:39:34
 GMT)
Organization: ProgramVareVerkstedet
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2000 07:39:34 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-02-11T07:39:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

G <gmw@interact.net.au> writes:

|   Has anyone done any measurements on the different speeds and
| memory requirements of comparable applications written in C++
| and Ada95.  I am learning both languages.

Probably, but it is not very interesting. You should rather look at
the language design when your trying to assess the two languages.

-- 
Preben Randhol -- [randhol@pvv.org] -- [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/]     
         "Det eneste trygge stedet i verden er inne i en fortelling." 
                                                      -- Athol Fugard