From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e17a4d5bc0d42b86 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-31 16:01:41 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Ronald Cole Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? Date: 31 Jan 2001 16:01:40 -0800 Organization: Forte International Technical Consulting Services - +1 760 499 9142 Message-ID: Sender: ronald@yakisoba.forte-intl.com References: <94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Channel Islands" X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4792 Date: 2001-01-31T16:01:40-08:00 List-Id: Florian Weimer writes: > The Python and Emacs VMs are quite widespread and platform independent > (the Emacs VM has probably been ported to more platforms than the > JVM). And both support loading arbitrary bytecode (AFAIK, Perl does > not), so it's really possible to adapt an Ada compiler to this > platform. Last time I checked, the emacs "vm" was a lisp interpreter. Why would anyone want an Ada to emacs-lisp translator? -- Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412 Ronald Cole Phone: (760) 499-9142 President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152 My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B