From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108717,980731991d339e6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid108717,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38c30507c308a2ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: getting started
Date: 1998/07/26
Message-ID: <m3yath7gll.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 374961223
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <6mocs6$cfh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <358FE086.11351878@cl.cam.ac.uk>
 <359E510F.636ACCA2@swipnet.se>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 21:37:43 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.programming
Date: 1998-07-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Henrik Carlqvist <henrik.carlqvist@swipnet.se> writes:

> GNU Emacs is nice, but for programming I think that xemacs is even
> better. It gives color syntax higlightning which makes the code easier
> to read and easier to find errors about non-matching paranteses or "".

Isn't that just font-lock?  My version of emacs (20.2.1) does color
syntax hightlighting already.