From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5394d9ca5f955366
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: pointers & OOP
Date: 1999/05/05
Message-ID: <m3yaj3qvsd.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 474384269
References: <m3k8uszln5.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <$DL10CAsSgL3Iwj3@jr-and-assoc.demon.co.uk> <7gn7gr$fr5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <MVsZ8DAT0AM3EwF3@jr-and-assoc.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 10:14:17 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John Robinson <john@jr-and-assoc.demon.co.uk> writes:

> Hence, a mapping from UML to Ada 95 should always map a single UML class
> box onto a package containing a single tagged type.  Although the
> language allows multiple tagged types to be declared in a single package
> it makes no sense whatsoever to do so.  

This is completely wrong.  Browse the ACM Ada95 patterns archive for
many examples.

<http://www.acm.org/archives/patterns.html>