From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-27 14:28:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: status of Ada STL?
Date: 27 Sep 2002 23:21:05 +0200
Organization: Organized? Me?
Sender: mb@jupiter.solar.system
Message-ID: <m3y99nnn7i.fsf@jupiter.solar.system>
References: <bebbba07.0206132321.23d72ac8@posting.google.com>
 <aedgoc$to7$1@news.iucc.ac.il>
 <bebbba07.0206151051.1c25cf1e@posting.google.com>
 <aekvgj$2f4$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3d0f0c40_1@news.tm.net.my>
 <aeq2as$l0m$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <uoh6j2rak72b5b@corp.supernews.com>
 <amcf5p$m5m$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net> <uoka2alhr78538@corp.supernews.com>
 <amf4tf$183$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1033161946 01 652 OX8yb6vSnaJ7w 020927 21:25:46
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 320025674319-0001@t-dialin.net
X-message-flag: IMPORTANT MESSAGE -- PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY!!!
X-Accepted-File-Formats: ASCII, .rtf, .ps, .pdf - *NO* MS Office files
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29391
Date: 2002-09-27T23:21:05+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <mcondic.auntie.spam@acm.org> writes:

> OTOH, if there was some body of vendors, academics, SIGAda people, major
> users and gadflies that were willing to declare "This reference
> implementation of linked lists is what will come with all compilers as of
> next week..." then we'd have a linked list library. Would it be 100%
> portable? Would it be 100% flawless? Would it be 100% well specified in its
> behavior? No, no and no. But it would *exist* and I think thats a big deal.

Until that happens, what would be the semi-official reference
implementation of c.l.a? Any votes?