From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,799e6e37c90ca633
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Future Ada language revisions?
Date: 1998/10/06
Message-ID: <m3ww6ew4b4.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 398268536
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <6um7on$db5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <EACHUS.98Oct2164706@spectre.mitre.org>
 <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810031123180.20730-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <6v9es0$bnv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810042210470.18465-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 07:07:29 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com> writes:

> I'd be happy to oblige. If you remember the names and dates of the threads
> under which this topic has been argued (obviously *not* to death) I'll spend
> some time there looking. 

The thread was called "functions with out parameters", and took place
and Sep/Oct of 1995.  I just looked it up in DejaNews.