From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,772ae8afc5db35f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Can't export object of private type
Date: 1999/03/01
Message-ID: <m3ww116o6m.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 450047993
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <7b1k4h$13k6@news3.newsguy.com> <F7p7Dq.DE1@syd.csa.com.au>
 <7b4517$2bbr@news3.newsguy.com> <m3d82u17lb.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <7be1p0$mjg$4@plug.news.pipex.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 10:45:35 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> writes:

> Matthew's solution is quite like mine (essentially one package per singleton
> object), except that he actually employs Ada 95's tagged type dynamic
> polymorphism mechanism -- which I strived to avoid (purely for didactic
> reasons, of course ;-) -- producing (probably) a far neater solution.


I strive to avoid it to, but one of the constraints on a solution was
that it use polymorphism.