From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86e4f25e3cb89995 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Ada 200X? Date: 1998/07/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 374964412 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <6pdt77$qgo$1@news-1.news.gte.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 21:45:35 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: jlvojir1 writes: > I ran acrosssome articles that you have writen in the Ada news > group. I am purchasing books on the subject and having previous > experience with C/C++ I hope to make the conversion painlessly and join > your elit group, but a comment you said in your letter confused me. > Using the term "Ada 200x" I have never heard of this proposed standard > your where you just saying that whenever the next standard appears that > the team should add this. I want to learn the newest Ada standard, the > notion that another standard is sneaking up just after I have invested > money and time in this venture and then be left behind with old news. The most recent version of Ada was approved as an international standard in Feb 95. There is no such thing as "Ada 200x".