From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca15935e4fb21334
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Storage space question
Date: 1998/12/10
Message-ID: <m3vhjk53rs.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 420856515
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <9v6hGdgMLuwN-pn2-v5sq1RxFJ1z1@dt182n2f.tampabay.rr.com>
 <366FE278.FAF73497@pwfl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 09:01:42 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marin David Condic <condicma@bogon.pwfl.com> writes:

> If you've got a good avionics-quality, embedded target, Ada compiler,
> I'd expect it to have switches/options to disable some of this storage
> allocation. In most compilers of this sort, if you promise not to ask
> certain kinds of questions the compiler will agree to make
> smaller/faster code, so look into the implementation defined pragmas and
> compiler options.

Not implementation-defined, standard-defined: pragma Discard_Names
throws away the tables containing the images of enumeration literals.